Why Don’t Liberals Call Out Feel the Bern’s Lies?

 

 

So, what’s the deal with American liberals? When a Republican lies, liberals can’t wait to call them pathological liars like they should. But when a Democrat running for president lies, liberals say it’s a mistake, it’s misconstrued, taken out-of-context or else the candidate bitches about the other side beating up on him. More to the point; during the last week Bernie Sanders lied more than once; including after ambushing Pope Francis in his hotel. But liberals won’t say he lied.

The lies started the day Bernie Sanders announced on MSNBC and repeated on ABC’s The View that he was invited to the Vatican for a conversation with the Pope. As a Vatican expert wrote; the Pope or the Vatican never invited Bernie Sanders to anything. His foreign policy adviser Jeffrey Sachs and his public relations friend used their connections to get Sanders an invitation to speak for at a school conference for ten minutes. He wasn’t invited to Vatican to speak with the Pope.

After hearing a week’s worth of news reports that Bernie was summoned to the Vatican to talk to the Pope, implying he would get a papal endorsement, the real Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi had to announce that “Senator Sanders was not invited by the pope, but by the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.” Lombardi also said that the Pope would not be meeting with the candidate, Bernie Sanders because Francis doesn’t get involved in elections or politics and he was going to Greece.

So who continues lying when the Vatican and papal spokesman releases an official Vatican statement exposing a week-long lie? The Sanders’ campaign, that’s who. Instead of staying on the down-low and praying to god that people forget you just lied about the Pope, Sanders’ campaign punked the Pope; and then they lied some more.

According to the Sanders’ campaign, the night before he gave his speech at the school, the Pope sent a message that he changed his mind and wanted to have a meeting with him before he went to Greece. According to a gullible website that believed a Sanders’ acolyte who set up the speech at the school conference;

“While Sanders was having dinner later on Friday night, he learned that the pope would like to meet before leaving for Greece.”

This is despite the Pope announcing the day before he would not be meeting with Sanders. Because besides heading to Greece to talk about the refugees, he never gets involved with candidates during an election. In fact, sources at the real Vatican reportedly refused to return calls to Sanders’ campaign prior to his trip to Rome, and insiders closest to the Holy Father claimed the Pope didn’t want Sanders there at all. He didn’t want the distraction and he doesn’t get involved with candidates for office.

What the Pope wanted didn’t matter because Sanders and his foreign policy adviser Jeffrey Sachs wanted to make that pesky week-old lie go away; come hell or high water and at the expense of the Catholic pope.

The Politico story said “Bernie Sanders privately met with Pope Francis after all at the pontiff’s residence in Vatican City on Saturday morning before the pope left on a trip for Greece. The Democratic presidential candidate was joined by his wife Jane, advisor Jeffrey Sachs, Sachs’ wife, and Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo — who translated — for a roughly five-minute meeting before Pope Francis left for a trip to Greece. There were no photographs taken of the pope and Sanders together.”

Bernie Sanders knew damn well the story was a lie and he never refuted it because, hey, it made his other lies not lies; it’s what makes them pathological. And since no liberal will call him a liar nobody was going to contradict Bernie or dispute his telling of the “five minute meeting.” Good thing Pope Francis isn’t a liberal because he told a completely different version of the meeting that makes everything Bernie Sanders said a lie.

Since the Bern and crew were staying at the same hotel as the Pope and they knew about when he was leaving, something the Pope felt compelled to tell reporters, the Bern crew hung out in the lobby waiting for the Pope to descend for the ambush. According to the Pope, a man that isn’t known for lying and has no reason to;

This morning when I left, Sen. Sanders was there. … He knew I was leaving at that time. I had the kindness to greet him and his wife and another couple who were with them. When I came down, I greeted them, shook their hands and nothing more. This is good manners. It’s called good manners and not getting mixed up in politics. If anyone thinks that greeting someone means getting involved in politics, they should see a psychiatrist.”

It sounds like the poor pope was virtually ambushed in the lobby as he was leaving for Greece to pick up some refugees and bring them back to Rome. It also sounds like it was important to him to dispel the lie that he had a five minute sit-down meeting with Sanders. It is funny the Pope said “anyone that thinks that greeting someone means getting involved in politics should see a psychiatrist” because feeltheberns still think the pope is lying and that he is endorsing Bernie’s campaign.

The Bern’s fanatical followers are candidates for a psychiatric visit according to the pope; they claimed the Pope endorsed Sanders for president and there are official Bernie Sanders campaign posters all over the social media with pictures of the pope and a small child as if Francis is officially part of the campaign. It’s a lie, but hey, pathological liars can’t help themselves, right? At least that’s what liberals always say when they catch a Republican lying.

Does America have a law that says nobody can call out lies when they’re from the left? It’s an honest question because there’s been a solid week of Sanders lies that nobody calls lies. Know what’s a lie? Liberals calling themselves honest when they’re scared shitless to call out another liberal’s lies.

Bernie Sanders lied and the only guy on the planet with courage to say he lied is the pope. True, he didn’t call Bernie a liar in so many words, but he did take the time to do something no-one else would do; tell the world that Bernie’s version of the story wasn’t true. On the street “the story wasn’t true” means somebody lied.

Petulant Bernie-Brats Determined To Hand Republicans the White House

It is likely that most people have had the uncomfortable experience of being in the vicinity of petulant children at some time in their lives. One can almost excuse badly-parented brats who become angry and annoyed when they do not get what they want, but when allegedly well-educated adults do it, it is inexcusable. Americans are accustomed to petulant Republicans, or they should be after seven straight years of grown adults refusing to do their jobs because they failed to get what they want. But now it looks as if, like many things in this political environment, many pretend progressives, socialists, and “Democrats” are mimicking petulant Republicans and their teabagger cohorts.

Apparently, because they are angry and annoyed that they have not gotten exactly what they want, “as a protest thousands and thousands of Senator Bernie Sanders’ supporters are making plans and preparations to exit the Democratic Party.” Their complaint is that as a result of Sanders joining the Party, Democrats have moved so far to the right and away from the people who actually vote they are left with no option but to “stage a revolt within the Democratic party itself.”

Likely, it is may not be what Senator Sanders had in mind when he told his supporters America needs “a political revolution,” and hopefully not what he wants his supporters to do; at least one hopes that’s not his plan.  In fact, this screed is not really about Bernie Sanders, or Hillary Clinton for that matter. It is certainly not any kind of endorsement of a candidate. Liberal opinion columnists are not allowed to have opinions about any Democrat or a preference about which candidate wins the nomination; all Democrats are perfect. It is just too bad, and it could turn out to be too sad, that all progressives, socialists, and Democrats do not hew to that mindset; especially the petulant “bernieorbust” movement.

This self-titled “bernieorbustmovement claims that ever since Senator Bernie Sanders called for a political revolution, “the Democratic establishment started conspiring against them at every turn.” Never mind that Senator Sanders is a career politician that fits anyone’s definition of  “the establishment,” the idea that “the establishment” is out to get Senator Sanders’ supporters is sheer madness. Frankly, it reeks of the religious right’s paranoia and fanaticism; and a healthy dose of gross political ignorance.

The “bernieorbust” crew also strangely asserts that former president Bill Clinton committed election fraud in Massachusetts even though he is not running for office. They also claim that Democrats “fixed coin flips” in Iowa, and they rigged the Democratic debates to stop the Bern’s “storied” political revolution. A revolution they claim the Democratic National Committee will not allow to transpire any more than it will allow “their race to run fair and square to ‘let’ the best candidate win.” Seriously, if anyone is curious about what exactly constitutes a conspiracy theory, just re-read the last two sentences a couple of times. It is madness that threatens Democrats up and down the ballot in November.

The “bernieorbust” movement says, “If we the people of the Democratic party can get 5 million or 10 million Democrats to leave to leave the party enmasse (sic), and go to or form a NEW and better party, the DNC would be a LOT more hesitant to go up against us.” The grand plan is to “show the Democratic National Committee that Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz single-handedly caused a mass exodus from the party. And that she and Hillary Clinton are working to divide the party, not unite it, then we truly get the change inside the Democratic Party we demand.”

According to the “bernieorbust” movement, if their revolt to transform the Democratic Party into something more palatable to politically ignorant American “socialists” and petulant “progressive” brats, they will start up “in a brand new party, who’s (sic) main platforms are all what Bernie has been fighting for without a single establishment candidate running.”

This is exactly what no small number of liberal pundits have warned the left about for a couple of months to no avail. Now a new Wall Street Journal poll shows the pundits are not remotely off base with their warnings. According to the WSJ poll, 33 percent of Senator Sanders’ supporters claim that if their candidate is not the nominee, they will stay home in November and let the devastation of 2010 and 2014 put a Republican in the White House. Their goal is to teach the DNC the same lesson the EmoProgs thought they were teaching Barack Obama in 2010 when he annoyed them by not letting them have everything little thing they wanted. The resulting teabagger takeover and damage to the nation needs no comment.

This opposition attitude is not entirely unprecedented on the left. In 2008 some Hillary Clinton supporters embraced the “PUMA” (party unity my ass) moniker and refused to vote for eventual nominee and brilliant President Barack Obama. However, this time it is different because the bernieorbust folks believe if their candidate is the nominee and does win the White House, they will get all the “free stuff” Senator Sanders has never really promised them would be “free stuff.”

They want their “free healthcare, free college, and free union membership” even though Sanders has told them “that nothing is free” and that everyone, including the poor, will pay higher taxes for all that alleged “free” stuff. In fact, every ‘bernieorbust’ acolyte can see right here that the Sanders’ tax plan is a three-tiered rate system in which everyone will have to pay higher taxes for all that “free stuff.” It is how socialism works and if the bernieorbust folks were not politically ignorant they would know it and stop being brats.

These petulant brats’ actions and threats are not necessarily down to Senator Sanders by any means. In fact, one seriously doubts that many of the Bern Brats are even Democrats who will “leave the DNC en masse;” it is certain they are not progressives. Democrats and progressives are, for the most part, pragmatic voters who comprehend that in this or any other political environment one group or one socialist man does not and cannot enact anything without cooperation from Republicans. It is sheer political ignorance to believe otherwise.

It is one thing to be passionate about a candidate, but to plan and prepare to take down the only party serving as a firewall against a corporate theocracy Hell-bent and duty bound to eviscerate America is evil and vindictive. One would like to believe that this new bernieorbust faction is just emoting passion, but they have been so programmed by Karl Rove and the Koch brothers to literally hate Bernie’s opponent that as an increasing number of pundits warn, their petulance may put a Republican in the White House; something that is beginning to look like their real intent.