Evangelical Attack On Women’s Rights Hidden In GOP Tax Reform

Religious Republicans made another sneak attack on American women’s right to self-determination last week and there was barely a whimper; which is the reason the attack was done through subterfuge. And besides a lack of outrage,  there was a lack of media reporting that Republicans are embracing a Vatican dictate as the official stance of the GOP in the war on women. Based on the machinations Republicans are using to eliminate women’s reproductive rights, including the right to use contraceptives, they certainly know their agenda is highly unpopular; it is precisely why they ensconced a “personhood” provision deep in the 429-page Republican House’s tax reform legislation.

Despite several Varied states rejecting the bizarre, and frankly absurd, idea of “personhood,” as a legal provision and as a concept, Republicans are pushing the issue as a means of completely controlling women’s reproductive lives. For the second time in Trump and preacher Pence’s burgeoning theocracy, the federal government is officially  designating “personhood” status to a “eukaryotic cell formed by a fertilization event between a male (spermatozoa) and female (ookyte) gamete;” it is the result of the “moment of conception” Republicans consider sacrosanct.

Some Americans might recall from 8th grade Health Class that the human “eukaryotic cell” is known as a “zygote;” the single-celled organism Republicans are crusading to grant full citizenship and constitutional rights to as a means of creating a nation of women relegated to the 18th Century Hell of being perpetual birth machines or celibate.

As anyone with a pea-brain understands, Republicans indebted to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), evangelical fanatics, and the anti-women personhood movement  inserted the provision giving “personhood” rights to a fetus from the moment of conception as a prelude to banning abortion and birth control.

The provision seems harmless enough to an idiot, but it is the second time the federal government stated that the “moment of conception” (zygote) has the same rights as real living, and breathing, human beings. Even the evangelicals’ god of the bible said more than once that there is no “living being” until the fetus is out of the womb and breathing under its own power, but that “immutable word of god” doesn’t help evangelicals control women so they ignore it as if it came from Satan the Devil.

Republicans want to allow expectant parents to start putting away money into “tax-sheltered” savings accounts for college and private religious school tuition for the “child in utero.” If that is the case, then the next logical step is assigning the zygote, embryo, or fetus a Social Security number like any other living human being with their name on a tax or savings account. This atrocity is as serious as the Department of Health and Human Services “Mission Statement” providing full protections to “all Americans through every stage of life beginning at the moment of conception.

If anyone is dense enough to doubt that this sneak attack is not specifically for the benefit of the Vatican, personhood movement and anti-women’s rights evangelical groups, the statement by the president of the March for Life organization should dispel any doubt. Jeanne Mancini said:

A child in the womb is just as human as you or I yet, until now, the U.S. tax code has failed to acknowledge the unborn child [fetus, zygote]  — all while granting tax breaks for those seeking an abortion under the pretense of healthcare. The proposed tax plan is a huge leap forward for an antiquated tax code, and we hope this is the first step in expanding the child tax credit to include unborn children [fetuses] as well.”

Think about the absurdity of Mancini’s statement and consider that the so-called right to life cabal, with religious Republican assistance, wants to give tax-sheltered savings accounts and taxpayer-funded “child tax credits” to zygotes, embryos, and fetuses. Not because they care anything about life, but because they care about controlling women; a concern Republicans are happy to accommodate.

No doubt House Republicans will offer a tax credit for zygotes if it will further set in stone that the federal government of the most technologically advanced nation on Earth considers a zygote, embryo, or fetus a living breathing human being.

March for Life’s president of its political arm, Tom McClusky, said he was surprised Republicans were stealthy enough to sneak “personhood” language into tax reform language about college and private religious school savings plans. He said:

We’re thrilled about it, but it wasn’t something that we were specifically calling for. We’ll fight to make sure it stays in there.

The evangelicals and personhood movement will face opposition from women’s reproductive rights advocates such as NARAL, Pro-Choice America. A spokeswoman for the group said something they’ve said often since the Trump and preacher Pence administration began.

The GOP’s relentless obsession with advancing its dangerous anti-choice ideology knows no boundaries and no common sense. Inserting ‘personhood’ language into their tax bill is just the latest example of how they’re trying to turn back the clock on this country.”

And Representative Diana DeGette (D-CO) said:

This is a back-door attempt to establish personhood from the moment of conception. What’s next, giving a Social Security number to a zygote?”

The devious Republican maneuver to establish “personhood” on a zygote eliminates Coverdell Education Savings Accounts that allow families to put aside up to $2,000 for college savings accounts for living breathing children. Instead, religious Republicans are expanding 529 savings accounts for in utero beings to cover up to $10,000 per year for private and religious school costs.

The pro-choice movement is rightly concerned that bestowing personhood on a zygote is a “back-door” attempt to abolish Roe v. Wade, but they should be just as worried that contraception is next on the chopping block; it is right there in the 1968 papal encyclical Humanae Vitae.

That same document that prohibits abortions also prohibits any form of birth control that is “artificial;” only the “rhythm method” is considered “natural” and Vatican approved. By declaring a zygote, or the “moment of conception,” a living breathing human being, Republicans are setting the stage to ban contraception because it prevents fertilization and is tantamount to abortion.

Remember, the idea of preventing the formation of a zygote, which is how contraceptives work on a very basic level, is what the Vatican considers abortion. That was the premise Hobby Lobby’s owners proffered when they went before the United States Supreme Court to argue that no matter what human biology or medical science says, birth control is abortion. Although the Justices acknowledged the veracity of medical science and biology, they ruled that if Hobby Lobby’s evangelical owners deeply held religious belief says birth control is abortion, then birth control is abortion. It is why Hobby Lobby won its case and why women’s advocates, and opinion column writers, went ballistic warning it was the first step in banning women’s choice completely.

If anyone doesn’t believe that is the Republicans’ goal, just last week in Wisconsin Democrats attempted to add an amendment to another state-level Republican assault on women’s reproductive rights. That amendment simply called on Republicans to ensure that the evangelical attack would not prohibit women from using contraceptives; Republicans rejected the amendment out of hand. Remember, according to the Vatican, all contraceptives are regarded as “artificial” forms of birth control and are banned. For dog’s sake, even the Muslim religion doesn’t ban any “artificial” form of birth control; they do not want the religion’s adherents mired in poverty as a result more children than a family can support.

It is curious that women, and the men who claim to care about them, are not in the streets demanding an immediate halt to these religious Republican attacks on women’s rights. Nearly every two weeks there is a new attacks on women’s reproductive rights and except for a few advocacy groups complaining about “Republicans’ obsession” with women’s reproductive rights, there is relative silence. If pro-choice groups, and Democrats, would cite the real source of this war on women, male-dominated religion, it is likely the people would react. But no-one is willing to tell the people that their wives, sisters, mothers and daughters are under an assault from an extremist religious sect; and it is not Islam.

Women have a bleak future in store when Republicans finally win the war on women, and at this point it appears they are winning. America is still a vicious patriarchal society and the easiest way for Republican men to keep women out of politics, out of the workforce, and without a voice is keeping them in a perpetual state of childbirth. That is what will happen when Republicans succeed in eliminating women’s right to self-determination and at the rate this administration is going, it will be sooner than later and it happened while the people were laser focused on Trump’s tweets and not a bloodless coup d’état by evangelicals serving the needs of the Vatican.

Image: Eclectablog

Evangelicals Rage At Failure To Force Child Rape Victim To Give Birth

In a story that explicitly explains why America’s quickening into theocracy is sheer evil rivaling the religious tyranny under Taliban rule, a pair of Alabama evangelicals lashed out at an appeals court decision and a barely 12-year-old impregnated rape survivor because god and Catholic Church dogmata. A young girl was raped several times by an adult relative and a former director of the legal staff under maniacal Christian Supreme Court Judge Roy Moore, and the director of an evangelical “pregnancy center” held a press conference to publicly blame and shame the now-12 year old child of committing an act of violence.

The anonymous child drew the wrath of the two religious extremists for seeking a waiver to get the result of several rapes (a pregnancy) terminated without parental approval. The pair of evangelicals were even more incensed that an appeals court agreed that the “tween” should not be forced to suffer the lifelong consequences of being repeatedly raped, impregnated, and then have to give birth. If one listens to the evangelical running the COPE pregnancy center, Lorie Mullins, and a Judge Roy Moore acolyte Win Johnson, the child chose to be repeatedly raped and now has to live with the consequences of either being a sixth grade child raising a child, or with the guilt and shame of committing willful murder.

The appeals court overturned a biblical ruling by an “anonymous” county’s district attorney who decided that the fifth grader had to carry that fetus to term and then work it out for herself how to attend the sixth grade in the fall with a newborn in tow. The appeals court noted there was no dispute that girl was impregnated by an adult relative who raped her repeatedly. They also noted that the child and her siblings were removed from her mother’s custody five times and placed in the care of the Department of Human Resources (DHR) because of repeated physical abusive and neglect.

The fifth-grader had to petition the local juvenile court for a legal waiver to have the pregnancy terminated without her abusive mother’s consent, and after hearing testimony from the child and a DHR caseworker, the court determined the circumstances justified a waiver. One wonders what kind of monsters enact laws that force a child to “petition the court” for a waiver after being repeatedly raped, but it is Alabama where one of the evangelicals railing on the court’s and child’s decision claims that it is high time judges and courts start “standing up for god;” not the secular law and certainly not the 12-year-old victim of repeated sexual assaults.

The attorney who lashed out at the secular (read legal) ruling said the appeals court decision was stunning because they ruled that “a 12-year-old was mature enough to murder her own child in her womb.”

Win Johnson must be one of those typical biblically-stupid evangelicals because according to his own bible’s almighty and never erring god, there is no child in any woman’s womb; the fetus becomes “a living being” only after it leaves the womb and draws “the breath of life.” Still, Johnson was irritated with rage that he or no other evangelical got the opportunity to berate and shame the 12-year-old child to impress on her that what she really wanted to do was commit murder. He said:

“Now, nobody has said that to her, I bet you, in any of her counseling. Nobody has explained that to her in its starkest, rawest form, like that. But what if it was, what if she really thought through it, even as a 12-year-old and said, ‘Gosh, I don’t want that on my conscience.’ “

The woman who joined Johnson in railing against the court and the rape victim, Lori Mullins, boasted that she counsels hundreds of pregnant women, including those considering abortion and those after abortions. She said the aftermath of abortion often leads to depression, substance abuse and difficulty with relationships. She also said that a “child entering the sixth grade should not be allowed to take that step.” Here’s a clue for Mullins: a child entering the sixth grade should not be forcibly and repeatedly raped or forced by compassionless evangelicals to carry the result of several violent crimes against her to term.

This incident is not about some evangelical public officials’ opposition to abortion, it is about evangelicals attempting to enforce the Catholic Church’s 1968 dogma on all women no matter if they are forty-two year-old wives and mothers or an innocent child getting ready to enter the sixth grade.

One thing is abundantly clear: these so-called pro-life Christians have no compassion whatsoever, not for the newborn or the soon-to-be sixth-grader. Despite gnashing their teeth and Hellfire and brimstone scare tactics, neither of the pro-life cretins ever considered the plight and life of the 12 year-old child being forced again to submit to the will of adults over “a belief.”   One thing is certain, neither one of the evangelicals offered to pay for and raise the child while the child mother finishes attending grammar, junior and senior high school. It would have been the Christian thing to offer if they were not heartless evangelical bastards.